Can I afford a $300K house on a $200K salary?
Comfortable
Yes, comfortably — in 94% of simulated futures this purchase still reaches financial independence by 60, and there is headroom up to roughly $410K. That answer comes from a Monte Carlo simulation — thousands of futures with market crashes, job losses that cluster in downturns, real federal/state/FICA taxes, and the full carrying cost of owning — not from a payment-to-income ratio.
Adjust every assumption to match your life →
What the ratio rules can't see
At $200,000 of household income, a $300K purchase means $2,203 per month of true ownership cost — 13.2% of gross income. A classic 28% rule would bless that number and stop there. The simulation keeps going: it checks whether the cash left after housing, taxes, and spending still compounds into enough invested assets — about $2.2M in today's dollars for this household's spending — before age 60, across 1,000 different market histories, including the ones where a crash and a layoff arrive together. 0% of futures at this price end in a forced sale.
Common questions
What does the 94% number actually mean?
The model simulates 1,000 possible 30-year futures — different market returns, home prices, and job-loss timing, drawn from the assumptions listed on this page. In 94% of them, a household like this one that buys at $300,000 still accumulates enough invested assets to retire by 60. It is a property of the scenario, not a guarantee.
What monthly cost does a $300K house really carry?
About $2,203 per month all-in for this scenario: $1,478 of principal and interest at 6.3%, plus property tax, insurance, maintenance, and PMI where applicable — the number a payment calculator shows is only part of it. Cash needed at closing is roughly $73,404.
Is the 28% rule a better guide?
Payment-to-income rules can't see savings rates, taxes, market risk, or your retirement timeline — two households with identical payments can have wildly different odds of staying on track. That's why this page reports simulated outcomes instead. See the guide "Why the 28% rule misleads" for the full argument.
Same salary, different price
- $400K houseon a $200K salary
- $450K houseon a $200K salary
- $500K houseon a $200K salary
- $550K houseon a $200K salary
- $650K houseon a $200K salary
- $800K houseon a $200K salary
- $1M houseon a $200K salary
- $1.2M houseon a $200K salary
Same price, different salary
- $60K salarybuying a $300K house
- $70K salarybuying a $300K house
- $80K salarybuying a $300K house
- $90K salarybuying a $300K house
- $100K salarybuying a $300K house
- $110K salarybuying a $300K house
- $125K salarybuying a $300K house
- $150K salarybuying a $300K house
- $250K salarybuying a $300K house
Or browse every price and salary combination, start from how much house a $200K salary affords, see how your state's taxes move these odds, or read why the 28% rule misleads.